I calmed myself a little bit when I realized that the article was sparked from a panel discussion called "Is Social Media Killing PR?" which recently took place at The Horn Group to address the issue of social media and PR’s relationship.
The event was inspired by the growing number of blogs questioning the necessity of PR in this time of a social media boom. As the Horn Group described the event in an online invitation:
“Jason Calacanis thinks you should fire your PR agency. Robert Scoble thinks you should ignore it. Michael Arrington says PR is "broken." Jeremiah Owyang sees value in it, but has challenged PR people and their critics "to engage in a head on discussion".”
Possibly feeling the same sense of fiery objection that I did, Girls in Tech and The Horn Group got together, gathered a panel, and decided to tackle this issue head on against critics of PR and with advocates of the profession (you can catch a liveblog of the event HERE).
A great point brought up is the fact that social media is a TOOL. Public relations is so much more than that. In public relations, we use every communication tool at our disposal to get a message out to the public. We have strategy, we have tactics, and we have contacts that ordinary people may not have the access to.
There is one way I feel that social media could threaten public relations: if as professionals, we ignore its importance as a tool and do not make the effort to learn how to use it in the right way. Already though, agencies are working to understand the growing medium to its fullest.
Padilla Speer Beardsley, for instance, has created a team of social media experts within the agency called the SMERF team (Social Media Elite Response Force). The team holds frequent meetings to share new social media findings, and to educate those in the agency who wish to learn more about different types of social media. In the crunch of a new client pitch, the team can be called upon to generate ideas and help others understand the medium. In December, the group plans to hold a Social Media Boot Camp, so that all who wish to become proficient with this tool, can. (I get to give a speech about Twitter…. I love my job).
If agencies keep up to date on this medium, then I see no reason why we can not coexist peacefully, despite the grumblings of Jason Calacanis and others. Social media is another tool for strategic communications to use to spread a message. In the end, what really matters is that you have a good message that people are willing to listen to and take seriously. Kara Swisher of the Wall Street Journal’s “All Things D” said it best at the end of the panel discussion:
“What's important is that you're representing a company that genuinely has a good product. You cannot (do) PR (on) a crappy product and it doesn't matter how many press releases you get on a website. All that really matters is that you have a really good product. I don't remember the last time I picked up the phone and went ‘Oh my God, it's a communication tool...’ Focus on the product!”
6 comments:
This is an amazing analysis. I'm so glad PR agencies are taking initiative to understand and engage social media. Hopefully big traditional agencies (*cough* CM *cough cough*) will embrace it in the same way....
Thank you much Libby. Your reshare of that post got me all fired up enough to create my own response. Also, I enjoyed imagining the Fail Whale plotting the murder of PR. Call me quirky... but....
i mean, you had me with the fail whale knife jpg, but i loved the post too :)
"Social media is another tool for strategic communications to use to spread a message." I think the key to all of these changes is right in this sentence. Advertisers, PR professionals, designers...we're ALL strategic communicators. The same way advertisers are using these tools, PR folks can, and should, do the same. I think there's always been some tension between the two disciplines and I think advertisers often don't see PR as a creative field (which is such an uneducated view), but these changes in the media environment are just another chance for ALL communicators to grow their repertoire...including PR. I'd love to see agencies seeking out a mutually-beneficial relationship with their PR firms. Hopefully social media will be a chance for them to connect and relate. Just keep doing amazing work--I know you are! :)
Really great post.
I worked for Weber Shandwick as a designer and I know that PR firms are lacking in creative, well anything that isn't cliche. I do agree they have many contacts and different routes in boosting your visibility and for large companies, they should have such communications experts on hand to spin and control when issues arrive.
I know its a bit different, but when it comes to viral and creative Burger King and CPB have been killing it. Telling customers they got rid of the Whopper. Dropping wallets(despite it being an unoriginal idea) is still way viral.
And i totally agree a product should be worthy of being sold. Unfortunately, if we did that there would be only one company that does it right and we'd all be out of business. Thanks Apple.
Oh Typography, I just have to dispute (respectfully) that there is a lack of creative in PR agencies. I think it honestly depends on the agency to make that distinction.
However, I also feel that it is so important for PR to work with advertising to enhance/call to attention the creativity that already exists through their efforts. I will not dispute that some of the greatest creative minds exist in advertising, and I'm definitely not on the side of Ries and Ries when they say advertising is dead and PR is rising. I'm more on the side of working together collectively. A great campaign is much more than one component or the other, it's a marriage of all strategies.
Post a Comment